Skip to main content

Trump, Mika and Morning Joe


Trump on Morning Joe during happier times

Mika just may turn out to be Donald Trump's Monica.  It all seemed innocent enough at first, our president firing back some angry tweets after she and Morning Joe lit into Trump's latest embarrassing episode - fake Time covers hung in several of his country clubs.  No less than eight framed copies according to a Washington Post article, which also had our tweeting president fuming.  But, the whole thing got ratcheted up a notch when he vented on Joe Scarborough, Mika's paramour, bragging that Joe begged him to stop a National Enquirer article that threatened to expose his illicit love affair with Mika.

Not that it was exactly secret.  SNL had already spoofed their on-screen romance, but apparently Joe and Mika weren't quite ready to go public so the White House thought it would put a little pressure on them to ease off on their attacks.  Joe apparently decided his journalistic integrity was at stake here and said, fuck it, go ahead, make my day, or words to that effect, so the NE article ran.

To make matters worse, Mika looked just fine New Year's Eve, the infamous night in question.  Not only had she had a successful nip/tuck to get rid of her "turkey neck" but Trump was apparently complimenting her on it all night, as were others at his gala event.  This Vanity Fair article goes into more detail if you feel the need to explore the subject deeper.

What makes this nasty episode particularly interesting is that when the Time cover story broke, Trump threatened Jeff Bezos with "internet taxes" for allowing his paper to publish such "fake stories."  Yep, amazon owns the Washington Post.  Bezos bought it for $250 million back in 2013 and has revitalized the paper into a national force.

It doesn't matter that amazon already pays sales taxes in all 50 states, Trump was ready to impose an "internet tax" as he felt amazon didn't pay enough.  Either that or he wasn't aware that such federal "internet taxes" don't exist.  Probably the latter, once again demonstrating how terribly misinformed he is.

Republican leaders did take pause, but Paul Ryan and others offered the same faint reprimands they did for Trump's previous sexist comments and blatant ignorance.  Very few were willing to speak out, I guess worried they might face the wrath of the National Enquirer or worse an angry twitter tirade.  This left it up to Ana Navarro to launch one of the most virulent attacks on the "Lunatic Man Baby" on mainstream television.  Ms. Navarro is a Republican strategist, having worked for Jeb Bush, John McCain and Jon Huntsman.

So why are Republicans so sanguine about Trump's brutal misogyny?  It's understandable that Elaine Chao would be reticent given that she is a member of his cabinet, but Condoleeza Rice has no such close relations and continues to give Trump a free pass.  It's moved beyond language, Condi, to actual threats of intimidation, and that's putting it kindly.

It is easy to see why James Comey and others were nervous when they confronted Trump because this is a guy who will resort to whatever means it takes to get his way.  The events of June 28-30 were bad in themselves but ominously point to a pattern of behavior that fully justifies Comey's concerns, which he presented at Senate hearings earlier this month.  Remember that?  Trump appears to have channeled Tony Soprano and is running the White House like a New Jersey criminal den.

At what point do Republican leaders say enough is enough?  Democratic Congresspersons are already looking to the 25th amendment as a way to remove Trump from the White House, as it does appear he is mentally unfit to continue as president.  An elementary school teacher wouldn't allow such behavior in her classroom, why should we accept it in the White House?

Unfortunately, there is an underbelly in America that seems just fine with the President's angry tweets, more upset that Julie Banderas has the audacity to question their "Pres" than they are Ronna McDaniel, the RNC chairwoman, who defended Trump in this recent Fox News segment.

So, it doesn't matter that our president is a serial misogynist, or has no idea how our tax system works or sees the White House as the Bada Bing!   Anything goes in the minds of a substantial portion of the Republican Party because he still "stands for our values," whatever they might be at this point.  Condoleeza Rice, Elaine Chao and Ronna McDaniel should all be deeply embarrassed and hurt that they have to issue such statements to defend our "Lunatic Man Baby" in the White House.

Comments

  1. In my many years on this planet I have never encountered anyone as psychologically needy as Trump. If he weren't such an idiot, I might feel some compassion for the man. But that is frankly impossible.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is something odd and so self serving about the whole thing. Almost wonder if it is some kind of perverse game going on between Trump and the media as all it seems to do is boost ratings for these networks and programs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. CNN overreacted to the video of Trump "bodyslamming" their network. What would really gall Trump is if the news media simply decided to boycott him for one day. No news whatsoever of the White House.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Trump has tapped into the fact that vast numbers of Americans taking nothing seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Republican Senator Toomey explains why his party has not come up with a concrete alternative to ACA - "we did not expect Trump to win":



    https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/one-reason-the-gop-health-bill-is-such-a-mess-they-didnt-think-trump-would-win/2017/07/06/bed6a8e0-624a-11e7-8adc-fea80e32bf47_story.html?utm_term=.e4e70c8176e6


    In other words, the GOP was hell bent on attempting to sabotage a possible Hillary Clinton administration. Not on offering concrete solutions to existing problems. How typical of this party and how foolish of people to vote for them since this has always been so obvious.


    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

O Pioneers!

It is hard not to think of Nebraska without thinking of its greatest writer.  Here is a marvelous piece by Capote, Remembering Willa Cather . I remember seeing a stage production of O Pioneers! and being deeply moved by its raw emotions.  I had read My Antonia before, and soon found myself hooked, like Capote was by the simple elegance of her prose and the way she was able to evoke so many feelings through her characters.  Much of it came from the fact that she had lived those experiences herself. Her father dragged the family from Virginia to Nebraska in 1883, when it was still a young state, settling in the town of Red Cloud. named after one of the great Oglala chiefs.  Red Cloud was still alive at the time, living on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota, in the aftermath of the "Great Sioux Wars" of 1876-77.  I don't know whether Cather took any interest in the famous chief, although it is hard to imagine not.  Upon his death in 1909, he was eulogi

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire

  Welcome to this month's reading group selection.  David Von Drehle mentions The Melting Pot , a play by Israel Zangwill, that premiered on Broadway in 1908.  At that time theater was accessible to a broad section of the public, not the exclusive domain it has become over the decades.  Zangwill carried a hopeful message that America was a place where old hatreds and prejudices were pointless, and that in this new country immigrants would find a more open society.  I suppose the reference was more an ironic one for Von Drehle, as he notes the racial and ethnic hatreds were on display everywhere, and at best Zangwill's play helped persons forget for a moment how deep these divides ran.  Nevertheless, "the melting pot" made its way into the American lexicon, even if New York could best be describing as a boiling cauldron in the early twentieth century. Triangle: The Fire That Changed America takes a broad view of events that led up the notorious fire, noting the gro

Colonel

Now with Colonel Roosevelt , the magnum opus is complete. And it deserves to stand as the definitive study of its restless, mutable, ever-boyish, erudite and tirelessly energetic subject. Mr. Morris has addressed the toughest and most frustrating part of Roosevelt’s life with the same care and precision that he brought to the two earlier installments. And if this story of a lifetime is his own life’s work, he has reason to be immensely proud.  -- Janet Maslin -- NY Times . Let the discussion begin!